Design, development, and validation of artificial skin as a low-cost learning tool

Authors

  • Aziel Alejandro Peralta Ramírez Universidad de Sonora https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-6078
  • Sergio Trujillo López Universidad de Sonora
  • Gonzalo A. Navarro-Armendariz Universidad de Sonora
  • Sayil A. de la Torre-Othon Universidad de Sonora
  • Juan Antonio Medina Aguirre Universidad de Sonora
  • Marcial R. Sierra Cervantes Universidad de Sonora
  • Gabriel H. Coronado Hernández Universidad de Sonora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59420/remus.12.2024.219

Keywords:

Clinical simulation, Artificial skin, Low-cost model, Educational validation

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation offers the practice of complex clinical scenarios in a safe environment, allowing for risk-free error-making. Physical skin models, made from non-living materials, mimic the properties and functions of real skin, making them useful in clinical simulation due to their stability, low cost, and easy storage.
Objective: To design, develop, and validate an effective and low-cost artificial skin model for clinical simulation.
Method: An artificial skin was created with glycerin and gelatin, with a realistic appearance, smooth texture, semi-flexibility, and 8 mm thickness. Validation was conducted using Likert-type surveys with 11 physicians and 52 students, assessing learning, morphology, and functionality for surgical techniques and peripheral venous access practices.
Results: 90% of the evaluation group showed a favorable attitude toward the model as a learning tool, 90.5% in morphology-functionality for surgical techniques, and 85% for peripheral venous access.
Conclusions: A low-cost, reusable, reheatable, and reshaped skin simulator suitable for a variety of clinical scenarios was developed. Specialists and students responded favorably to the simulation, with a cost nearly 90% lower than existing models. Synthetic skin models are viable simulation tools and are well-regarded by experts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rodríguez A, Martínez E, Garza G, Rivera A. Satisfacción en simulación clínica en estudiantes de medicina. ecimed. 2021; 35(3):11-15. https://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v35n3/1561-2902-ems-35-03-e2311.pdf

Hernández L, Barona V, Durán C, Olvera H, Ortiz G, Ávila S et al. La seguridad del paciente y la simulación clínica. Primer Encuentro Internacional de Simulación | Simex 2017. 2017; 1(1):9-18. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/facmed/un-2017/uns171b.pdf

Spoerer S, Vela J, Contreras C, Ortiz C, Caro I, Riquelme C et al. Elaboración de un simulador de trauma torácico a partir de un torso cadavérico utilizando tecnología de imágenes digitales e impresión 3D. Rev. Chil. Cir. 2021; 73(3). https://doi.org/10.35687/s2452-45492021003906

Dąbrowska A, Rotula G, Detler S, Spano F, Camenzind M, Anselmin S et al. Materials used to simulate physical properties of human skin. Skin Res Technol. 2015; 22(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12235

Seseña E, Guerra C, Varas I, Achurra P, Jarry C, Navia A et al. Entrenamiento de colgajos locales en un modelo simulado de alta fidelidad y bajo costo. Rev Latinoam Simul Clin. 2020; 2(3):92-97. https://doi.org/10.35566/97890

Kei J, Mesbust D, Duggan L. The REAL CRIC Trainer: Instructions for Building an Inexpensive, Realistic Cricothyrotomy Simulator With Skin and Internal Tissue, and Flash of Air. J Emerg Med. 2019; 56(4):426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.023

Daniel Guerrero A, Mendoza Méndez A, González Sánchez J, Martínez H, Torres Lugo M, Valdéz Ávila S et al. Diseño y validación de un simulador híbrido de paracentesis. Educ Med. 2019; 20(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.10.033

Víaña-Fragoso S, Rosario-Rojas A, Jiménez-Ángeles L. Diseño de un simulador de paciente para auscultación cardiaca. Rev Latinoam Simul Clin. 2020; 2(3):146-153. https://doi.org/10.35566/97904

Valderrama-Treviño A, Granados Romero J, Méndez-Celis C, Chernitzky-Camaño J, Barrera Mera B, Montalvo-Javé E et al. Comparación entre 3 modelos para el entrenamiento en el cierre de una herida superficial. Inv Ed Med. 2017; 6(23):147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2016.09.006

Williams T, Snyder C, Hancock K, Iglesias N, Sommerladder C, DeLeo S et al. Development of a Low-cost, High-fidelity Skin Model for Suturing. J Surg Res. 2020; 256:618-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.051

Published

2024-09-09 — Updated on 2024-09-15

How to Cite

Peralta Ramírez, A. A., Trujillo López, S., Navarro-Armendariz, G. A., de la Torre-Othon, S. A., Medina Aguirre, J. A., Sierra Cervantes, M. R., & Coronado Hernández, G. H. (2024). Design, development, and validation of artificial skin as a low-cost learning tool. REMUS - Revista Estudiantil De Medicina De La Universidad De Sonora, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.59420/remus.12.2024.219

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)